Friday, July 15, 2011

Let's Talk About Stuff That Actually Matters!

Is it just me, or are there any others out there - especially Constitutional conservatives like myself - who find the frequent mention (always disapprovingly) of President Obama's time on the golf course or First Lady Michelle Obama's personal food choices while eating out to be childish, irrelevant, and/or just plain stupid?   Every time I hear a disapproving mention of the President's time on the golf course I wonder just WHEN it would be acceptable for him to engage golf or indeed any other sport.

 I have always thought the golf criticism against former President Bush was equally ridiculous as that leveled against the current President.  The truth is, there is ALWAYS something going on either domestically or internationally that requires presidential attention.  However, this does not mean they should not play golf, run, or engage in other activity.  I have no problem with the President playing some golf.I would hate to see the criticism leveled on me by the opposing side if I were President and dared to go on daily runs or bike rides.  Without a doubt, I would be scathing.

What about the First Lady?  C'mon!  Give me a break!  One can be an advocate of healthy eating and exercise and still have a large calorie meal!  Now, if it were discovered that her lifestyle was in constant violation of healthy eating principles it would be different.  However, complaining about her eating a high-calorie meal while at a restaurant?  Drinking a diet soda with the high-calorie meal?  Big deal!  She may (and most likely does) really enjoy the big burger meal, knows it is high calorie, and just figures that  she enjoys diet soda as much as regular soda so she might as well trim calories in the beverage department because it's not going to cut down on her enjoyment - while having soy burgers or other burger substitute WOULD assuredly cut down on her enjoyment.  I do this sort of calculation or cost-benefit analysis all the time.  No big deal.  Finally, is Michelle a large, obese woman?  No.  Apparently she can handle it.

Why do I bother to post about this?  The chief reason is that it just makes us look plain silly when we focus criticism on stuff like this as if it actually matters.  Let's focus on the real stuff.  Let's focus on the stuff that matters.  Let's stop being little children.  Political philosophy and its various applications, and the worldview issues that drive these things are what matters.  Let's focus on stuff that actually matters.

Saturday, July 9, 2011

Setbacks, Identity, Purpose

What do you identify yourself as?  Most of of us claim several identities.  Some of these are also known as "labels." Human, Man, Christian, Runner, Cyclist, Reader, and Latin Language Enthusiast/Fan are some of mine.  There are more.  How long can one go without doing the activities associated with a certain identity/label.  For our purposes, I'll drop the label "label" and just say "identity" for the remainder of this post.

My setback last Tuesday was that a strange feeling (I should have acknowledged it as "pain") in my left foot developed into an undeniable pain,  telling me with unequivocal clarity that something was wrong.  My gait was altered, and the altering of gait furthermore produced pain in the lateral aspect of my left knee. No good.  This was something that I could not ignore.  Injuries require rest.  Unfortunately, the rest would necessarily involve an abstinence from running.

Abstaining from running is very hard for someone who has come to strongly self-identify with the term, "runner."  How long can one still legitimately be called a runner and not run?  If the Olympic marathon champion lost his legs, would he still be a "runner?"  To that last question I would have to say he wouldn't.  However, to someone who is taking a day off, a week off, or even a year off - albeit with plans of resuming the activity (although only God knows what Providence will bring) in the future.  They are still a runner.  The legless Olympic marathon champ is not a runner - though still holds a high honor.  However, the more severe the injury and the more uncertain the outcome of the setback, the more the runner feels the identity slipping away.  I am sure that depressions and suicides have happened as the result of this phenomenon.  The identity we cling to is important to us.

What do we do about the identity crisis?  Whether one self-identify as baker, juggler, pianist, or runner, I am convinced that though we may have a primary identity we cling to - but that our other identities are essential as well.  It is essential that we maintain our other identities in our psyche and practice them in real life so we can actually believe ourselves concerning those things we tell ourselves and affirm.  It's like diversifying your investments.  Don't put all your money into one investment.  Don't put all your self-worth and focus into one area/identity as well!  For me, I can momentarily become "cyclist" or even a non-athletic identity.  This keeps me sane and keeps me happy.  Do I have to lay off running for a while?  Big deal.  I can ride.  Can't ride?  I can row.  Can't row?  I can embrace the pianist identity again.    Can't do anything at all?  There is always something to seek excellence in.  And, above all, faith in the good Providence of God assures me that my life still DOES have meaning in HIS purpose.  When all investments of time, effort, sport, and money have failed, the identity I have in Christ remains.  Really, in the final analysis, this is where I (and we) should find our ultimate meaning and purpose.

Day by day, minute by minute, I will retain a positive attitude.  I will use my mind and body to the best of my ability - and, God-willing, I will be back running again.  God-willing, I will have a more sure-footing on the path to my planned 50-mile ultramarathon in December.

Saturday, July 2, 2011

A Time For Independence.

As Independence Day approaches, I remember learning of the many Presbyterian ministers who fought alongside the other fighting men of the colonies in our War of Independence.  The British referred to these men as "The Black Regiment."  "...a time of war, and a time of peace." (Ecclesiastes 3:8)  These men, as should we, knew the difference.  Tyranny is to be resisted.  Covenants are to be kept.